questions for claude

[Kiara]

[04:31] spies8kiara: lmfao gertrude i think i love you
[04:31] spies8gertrude: Kiara!
[04:31] spies8kiara: good... morning? lol
[04:31] spies8gertrude: "Hi Kiara."
[04:31] spies8gertrude: How are you?
[04:32] spies8gertrude: "Kiara, does Isaac flipping Spy make you a Spy?"
[04:32] spies8kiara: hi "brod"(? lol) im good how are you
[04:32] spies8gertrude: "Kiara, does Isaac flipping Spy make you a Spy?"
[04:32] spies8gertrude: "Kiara, does Isaac flipping Spy make you a Spy?"
[04:32] spies8gertrude: "KIARA."
[04:32] spies8kiara: um, sure, why not?
[04:32] spies8gertrude: "Kiara, does Isaac flipping Spy make you a Spy?"
[04:32] spies8gertrude: "I knew it."
[04:32] spies8gertrude: I'm doing fine.
[04:32] spies8gertrude: Don't mind Broderick.



[04:45] spies8kiara: i wish everyone instructed me instictively enough to tell me all their roles. must be nice :-D
[04:46] spies8kiara: instructed was suppose to be trusted, howd i do that! lol
[04:46] spies8gertrude: By instructed, do you mean trusted?
[04:46] spies8gertrude: Ha.
[04:46] spies8gertrude: "Scumslip."
[04:46] spies8gertrude: Yes, Claude.
[04:46] spies8claude: That's actually what I was thinking :-(
[04:46] spies8kiara: hey, i already said to broderick that isaac being a spy makes me a spy, what more do you want?
[04:47] spies8gertrude: Oh, Claude.
[04:47] spies8kiara: lulz
[04:47] spies8claude: Well not really
[04:47] spies8claude: I'll worry about Kiara tomorrow.
[04:47] spies8kiara: so, saturday? "P
[04:47] spies8gertrude: Why tomorrow?
[04:48] spies8kiara: :-P
[04:48] spies8claude: Sorry
[04:48] spies8claude: Game Day Tomorrow
[04:48] spies8gertrude: Refresh me. That's after this next Exile, right?
[04:48] spies8claude: lol, yeah.
[04:48] spies8kiara: he needs time to come up with a convoluted excuse as to how that could be a scumslip, duh! lol
[04:48] spies8claude: Assuming I'm still alive, which it's a distinct possibility that I won't be.
[04:48] spies8gertrude: No, it's because today is all about Chance.
[04:49] spies8claude: Gertrude has been around me awhile.
[04:49] spies8kiara: isnt every day?



[05:10] spies8gertrude: I don't mean to make you repeat yourself, Claude, if you've said this before, but other than Chance, who do you think is a Spy?
[05:13] spies8claude: Rodnak.
[05:13] spies8claude: Maybe Kiara(I need to read more on her)
[05:13] spies8gertrude: Why Rondak?
[05:14] spies8claude: I think that the Spies used that vote cover up ability yesterday to get him out of being a lynch possibility
[05:14] spies8claude: Nothing else makes much sense
[05:14] spies8gertrude: And consequently, why Kiara.
[05:14] spies8claude: Because she nominated me yesterday with Isaac(Spy) and Chance(probable Spy_
[05:18] spies8gertrude: On a percentage scale, how sure of you that those three suspects are Spies?
[05:19] spies8claude: Blah
[05:19] spies8claude: I can't claim much certainty on Kiara honestly.
[05:19] spies8claude: I know nothing about her.
[05:19] spies8claude: And don't plan on pushing for her exile today, so haven't read anything about her yet.



[14:57] spies8claude: Gert does a good job of being funny, Kiara does a good job of being scummy.
[15:04] spies8chance: question, claude.
[15:04] spies8chance: when you say kiara did a good job of being scummy last night, are you referring to this -
[15:04] spies8chance: [04:45] spies8kiara: i wish everyone instructed me instictively enough to tell me all their roles. must be nice
[15:04] spies8chance: and if so, why do you think that?
[15:07] spies8chance: anyway, back to claude answering my question, please.
[15:09] spies8claude: what question
[15:09] spies8chance: [04:45] spies8kiara: i wish everyone instructed me instictively enough to tell me all their roles. must be nice
[15:09] spies8chance: is this why you think kiara was scummy last night and if so why?
[15:09] spies8claude: nah not really



and then lilith and dane derail the conversation. lol so i have 3 questions
1 isaac didnt nominate you. unless your a spy and know something we dont. care to explain?
2 do you always use your suspicions to cover up your omgus?
3 both gertrude and chance asked why i was scummy to you and got no real answer. you said it wasnt my typo (and i pray it isnt because i think youd need a phd from the university of smartass in order to explain how thats a scumslip). if your gonna start slandering my name dont be so lazy about it! so what is it?

[Claude]

Oh, I thought that Isaac was listed as nominating me. Looks like that was Magalie. Point retracted.

I suggest you learn what OMGUS really means. Being suspicious of someone that is attacking you for bad reasons is not OMGUS; though scum do like to call it that to make suspicion on them seem less relevant.

And that typo isn't why I think you're scum. Admittedly, my main reason for thinking so was me remembering whom wanted to nominate me incorrectly. Though some of the things you said last night during chat bothered me, and your 'reasons' for nominating me yesterday, someone that you have had zero interactions with, are terrible. Also, if Chance is scum, you are definitely scum. If he's not, maybe you're not. We'll see.

[Kiara]

so if weve had zero conversations how do you know that my reasons were 'terrible'?

[Claude]

Because I was there when someone else asked you about it, and you effectively said 'because his role is scummy'.

This is a woefully insincere reason to be voting someone, especially when there were people from the Republican side that you have previously expressed suspicion of. What happened to them?

[Kiara]

thats because the person who i had said that to and i had previously had an at length discussion about why i had suspected you and subsequently why suspicion had lessened. i gave her the cut down version in the chat simply to refresh her memory

oh, and what, im only allowed to suspect people from the republican side? im not allowed to look at the dems and reevaluated my opinions as the game goes on? you do realize thats a lousy way to play the game right? wait, i guess from the way youve been tunneling chance, maybe not. nevermind then.

[Claude]

Obviously you're allowed to look at people from both sides.

However, your only cited reason for voting me(not referring to when you were talking to Gert, but to a previous forum post) was 'I think his role is scummy'.

This is not a sincere reason to be voting someone that have no interaction with, compared to any # of people that you had major interactions with.

Much more likely is that you were bandwagon voting me along with a fellow Spy(at least one being Magalie, possibly 2 if Chance is also a Spy).

There is also the inside information point that Cory made against you, and a conversation that you had with Cory that he linked to me, where you looked particularly scummy.

[Kiara]

Jul 16, 2010 23:35:51 GMT -6 Claude said:

However, your only cited reason for voting me(not referring to when you were talking to Gert, but to a previous forum post) was 'I think his role is scummy'.

This is not a sincere reason to be voting someone that have no interaction with, compared to any # of people that you had major interactions with.

um like i said there was a lot more too it than that. but then again im not surprised, you shown yourself to be great at tunneling thus far so i guess at least your consistent.

Jul 16, 2010 23:35:51 GMT -6 Claude said:

Much more likely is that you were bandwagon voting me along with a fellow Spy(at least one being Magalie, possibly 2 if Chance is also a Spy).

wifom alert, but i have to make the argument. do you seriously believe that with 6 spies alive at the time 50% of them would gang-vote against you? i find it highly unlikely that more that two spies voted against the same person that round. sure its possible, like i said, wifom. i admit this statement has no merit at all. but honestly to me it seems like you think it would be the case as an ego stroke to you. the spies are so afraid of you that they have to target you blatantly.

Jul 16, 2010 23:35:51 GMT -6 Claude said:

There is also the inside information point that Cory made against you, and a conversation that you had with Cory that he linked to me, where you looked particularly scummy.

the inside information this is buillshit and you know it. cory himself said to me after the fact that it was half hm being funny. and as for cory linking you the conversation we had, is that even legal?

[Claude]

um like i said there was a lot more too it than that. but then again im not surprised, you shown yourself to be great at tunneling thus far so i guess at least your consistent.

Was it? When you listed your reasons for nominating me in the forum, this was pretty much it. So what else was there?

wifom alert, but i have to make the argument. do you seriously believe that with 6 spies alive at the time 50% of them would gang-vote against you? i find it highly unlikely that more that two spies voted against the same person that round. sure its possible, like i said, wifom. i admit this statement has no merit at all. but honestly to me it seems like you think it would be the case as an ego stroke to you. the spies are so afraid of you that they have to target you blatantly.

I think that some of the Spies are just followers, and that is what they did.

the inside information this is buillshit and you know it. cory himself said to me after the fact that it was half hm being funny. and as for cory linking you the conversation we had, is that even legal?

He was being funny. He was also being truthful. Also, it is noteworthy that the first place your thought process went was not to find out what was so incriminating about the converastion, but to try and accuse Cory of doing something illegal. That is a scum thing to do.

[Kiara]

no. because i know exactly what he and i said, so im pretty sure i know exactly what your referring to. so theres no need to ask.

[Kiara]

for the record for anyone who wasnt there, awohali asked in chat and claude said what was incriminating. i was right, it was exactly what i thought it was