group chat saturday june 19
Jun 19, 2010 17:55:12 GMT -6
Post by Chance on Jun 19, 2010 17:55:12 GMT -6
spies8lawrence has entered the room. 5:45 pm
spies8claude has entered the room. 5:45 pm
spies8chance has entered the room. 5:45 pm
spies8camilla has entered the room. 5:45 pm
spies8isaac has entered the room. 5:45 pm
spies8broderick has entered the room. 5:45 pm
spies8chance 5:45 pm
lagged out, sorry. what did i miss?
spies8camilla 5:46 pm
nothing.
*nothing treally
*really
spies8broderick 5:47 pm
From some of the chat bits, they imply that you had discussed Cory with Mary before yesterdays chat in which you and Cory went a bit head to head.
Did you two discuss your conversations with Cory before?
spies8claude 5:48 pm
No, there was just a public discussion
I thought you were there...but maybe not.
spies8broderick 5:49 pm
So you didnt directly ask Mary about her conversation with Cory, and whether or nothe was pushy?
spies8claude 5:49 pm
Here is a timeline, to the best of my memory:
spies8claude 5:49 pm
Group chat started.
People made small-talk(alot of roleplaying was going on at the time)
Someone said that they had invited Cory but he didn't join, and someone else said that they did also.
I said that Cory had been very pushy towards me, and that combined with the fact that he was(or seemed to be) dodging chat invites was suspicious
spies8camilla 5:52 pm
Why dodge as chat invite?
He could have been busy, but idkk,,
spies8claude 5:52 pm
He couldn't have been that busy, he was talking to multiple people in personal chatr.
Seemed like he was just trying to avoid a group environment.
spies8camilla 5:52 pm
hmm..
spies8claude 5:52 pm
He says that he just 'didnt get the invites', but shrug.
That's not a statement that can be verified, so.
spies8camilla 5:53 pm
At this point, I'm about 50/50 on Cory.
spies8broderick 5:53 pm
So you didn't clarify with Mary about her conversation with Cory and whether or not he was pushy?
spies8broderick 5:54 pm
Yet you used it as a point of reinforcement for your own suspicions.
Yet hours later, you actually did clarify with her (as far as I awas around)
spies8camilla 5:55 pm
err.. what?
spies8broderick 5:55 pm
It really does not make sense to me that you would be using a piece of information to reinforce your suspicion before clarifying that it had actually occurred
spies8claude 5:55 pm
I knew she said it.
I clarified it to get exact details.
spies8camilla 5:55 pm
can someone PLEASE tell me what the hell is going on with this mess?
spies8broderick 5:55 pm
So she said that Cory was pushy?
I thought she claimed that she never said it?
spies8claude 5:56 pm
She claims that we were 'overstating' what she said.
spies8broderick 5:56 pm
A large mess Camilla.
spies8camilla 5:57 pm
gosh.
spies8broderick 5:57 pm
I get the impression it will only get worse. With people running with what someone says without actually checking to make sure it is correct.
I get that is something you did as well Chance?
spies8claude 5:58 pm
What Mary said isn't ultimately that important to me, because it only reinforced what I was already thinking.
spies8camilla 5:59 pm
It might not have necessarily been true. You have to understand that if you got caught in a lie, it would have made you even more suspicious.
spies8broderick 6:00 pm
Rather than discuss with me about my own comments, you went to people saying they were fragile points against you. That I was looking for a reason to suspect you.
If I had intended to make a case Chance, I would have. Rather than sort through a chat discussion to comment on.
spies8chance 6:01 pm
reading up.
spies8chance 6:01 pm
the bit about cory being 'pushy' has basically been clarified by this point.
spies8camilla 6:01 pm
lol h
spies8chance 6:02 pm
'pushy' was the word i used to describe how i believed mary felt about cory.
i don't think she ever actually used the word.
spies8broderick 6:02 pm
My suggestion. Dont put words into the mouths of others Chance.
spies8chance 6:03 pm
my suggestion. don't make mountains out of molehills, broderick.
spies8claude 6:03 pm
So why are you 50/50 on Cory, Camilla?
spies8camilla 6:03 pm
what if its a large molehill.
spies8broderick 6:03 pm
Im not making a mountain out of a molehill Chance
spies8chance 6:03 pm
aren't you?
i think we can all agree that cory can be kinda pushy. cory himself admitted that he's 'abrasive'. so does it really matter who said it first?
spies8broderick 6:04 pm
It is a serious issue. We are trying to hunt for spies here. But if things get muddled because people are putting words into the mouths of others. It is extremely messy and quite frustrating to sort through
spies8claude 6:04 pm
See, I told you Broderick is a citizen :-P
spies8camilla 6:04 pm
I'm 50/50 on Cory because he tends to hoard for info and not give any out, that and he can be kind of pushy. I'm not agreeing that the whole abrasiveness thing can be a factor, but something about him seems off.
spies8chance 6:05 pm
and as i said, it's been sorted through.
spies8claude 6:05 pm
I'm curious, Camilla, about these two statements of yours:
spies8chance 6:05 pm
see? cam agrees. :-P
spies8claude 6:05 pm
spies8claude: (10:09:34 PM)I would generally vote someone that I don't think is a spy before voting no exile
I agree, No Exile is a waste, but if you don't believe the person is a spy, why vote for them? There are other alternatives.
and
*spies8chance: (10:09:50 PM)in my book, getting rid of someone who may not be a spy, but is unhelpful/not participating is almost as good as getting rid of a spy. especially early on.
This seems perfectly logical to me, if the person isn't going to help you at all, why keep them? It's not like we're in a constant state of lylo or anything. I think the 'especially early on' validates this point, and I agree. I don't think it's 'almost as good' but its better than N/L.
spies8broderick 6:07 pm
My suggestion still stands. Let people speak for themselves, and refrain from putting words into the mouths of others. I know you agree with the words in the mouths of others Chance, since you told Jasmine she was putting words into yours not that long ago.
spies8camilla 6:07 pm
Those two statements actually compliment each other. I'm saying that you should lynch someone. I'm saying No Lynch is a waste in BOTH. Like I said, there are other alternatives than N/L
spies8chance 6:07 pm
example - lynch someone who's not participating/helping.
spies8claude 6:07 pm
I agree that they are somewhat similar, in sentiment.
spies8camilla 6:07 pm
If it means lynching a cit that is little to no help to you, then lynch them. in every single mafia game, the ghosts are always exiled first.
spies8claude 6:08 pm
But it's strange that you disagree with one, but agree with the other.
spies8broderick 6:08 pm
Not quite Camilla.
spies8chance 6:08 pm
she doesn't disagree at all.
spies8mary has entered the room. 6:08 pm
spies8broderick 6:08 pm
Quite often the nonactives get ignored until later
spies8chance 6:08 pm
"if you think a person is a spy, why vote for them"
spies8mary 6:08 pm
Hi.
spies8chance 6:08 pm
er, wait.
spies8broderick 6:08 pm
Hi Mary
spies8chance 6:08 pm
'sup mary.
spies8camilla 6:08 pm
I disagree with no lynch, and agree with lynching a lurker that doesnt help at all. Those two are actually very unrelated.
spies8isaac 6:09 pm
Hello Mary
spies8camilla 6:09 pm
Hey mary h
spies8chance 6:09 pm
'if you don't believe the person is a spy, why vote for them'
spies8chance 6:09 pm
with unhelpfuls/lurkers, it's often extremely hard to know anything about them one way or the other.
spies8claude 6:10 pm
Why are you answering for Camilla :-(
spies8chance 6:10 pm
i'm not. i'm saying i agree with her.
also claude is putting words in her mouth and i like camilla. :-(
spies8claude 6:11 pm
No, I'm not putting words in her mouth.
spies8broderick 6:11 pm
Thoughts Isaac?
spies8camilla 6:11 pm
You are making me seem shady in order to deflect suspicion on you. Stop changing tactics.
spies8claude 6:11 pm
lol
spies8chance 6:11 pm
you kind of are.
spies8claude 6:11 pm
Really?
spies8mary 6:11 pm
What did Claude say?
spies8claude 6:11 pm
Not really.
We weren't even talking about me before.
We were talking about Cory.
spies8chance 6:11 pm
spies8claude 6:08 pm
But it's strange that you disagree with one, but agree with the other.
spies8claude 6:11 pm
Here, let's read again:
spies8isaac 6:12 pm
Thoughts are right now that people need to let people speak for themselves...lol. I was here earlier during that whole fiasco and it was truly exhaustin
spies8claude 6:12 pm
spies8claude: (10:09:34 PM)I would generally vote someone that I don't think is a spy before voting no exile
I agree, No Exile is a waste, but if you don't believe the person is a spy, why vote for them? There are other alternatives.
Here, Camilla says that you shouldn't vote for someone that you think is a citizen. That's perfectly understandable.
*spies8chance: (10:09:50 PM)in my book, getting rid of someone who may not be a spy, but is unhelpful/not participating is almost as good as getting rid of a spy. especially early on.
This seems perfectly logical to me, if the person isn't going to help you at all, why keep them? It's not like we're in a constant state of lylo or anything. I think the 'especially early on' validates this point, and I agree. I don't think it's 'almost as good' but its better than N/L.
spies8camilla 6:12 pm
Who you have been directly suspecting since day one. and with all due respect, you have been on the chopping block since i came in. you have been discussing everything, when cory was in, you were trying to deflect suspicion onto him, now its me.
spies8claude 6:13 pm
I can't be trying to 'deflect' suspicion onto Cory if I've been suspicious of him since Day 1.
spies8claude 6:13 pm
And whether or not *I* am suspicious of Cory has no bearing on my asking you why YOU are suspicious of him.
spies8isaac 6:14 pm
LOL, thats kinda true you have had it out for Cory. But it does seem somewhate that you are focusing all on Cam at the m oment. I haven't really even had a chance to chat with you yet Cam...lol
spies8camilla 6:14 pm
Okay one, I disagree with lynching someone who is clearly not a spy. I do agree with lynching someone that is entirely unhelpful and is feckless in the long run, regardless of alignment.
spies8claude 6:14 pm
I said that I'd vote for someone that I 'don't think is a spy' instead of voting No Exile
spies8camilla 6:15 pm
I suspect Cory for being a bit too agressive a bit too soon, it's like, either he's a spy or he'll be imprisoned soon.
spies8claude 6:15 pm
Chance said that he would vote for someone that 'might not be a spy' if they're b eing unhelpful.
spies8broderick 6:15 pm
Clearly not a spy, and don't think a spy. Not the same thing
spies8claude 6:15 pm
These are very similar sentiments(I believe that you even said this a couple of minutes ago), but you responded to them very differently.
spies8claude 6:16 pm
Why?
spies8camilla 6:16 pm
you're really gonna make a case against me on how I worded things.
spies8claude 6:16 pm
Yes.
It doesn't help that you have really started flailing since I started asking questions, but yes, I will absolutely make a case on you based on these things.
It's not really 'how you worded things'. It's more that it looks like you were just trying to play up to citizens by saying 'you should never vote for someone you don't believe is a spy'
spies8camilla 6:18 pm
To be honest, that is one of the most ridiculous things I've ever heard.
I know clearly not a spy and may not be a spy are two different things. But if you're going to make a case against me, please use actual evidence.
And I'm not flailing. I'm calmly answering your questions. h
spies8claude 6:18 pm
And then woefully contradicted yourself in the next line by agreeing with a statement that was, in effect, the same as what you just disagreed with
spies8camilla 6:18 pm
If "playing up to the cits" is expressing your opinion, then yes. I was absolutely playing up to the cits.
spies8chance 6:18 pm
funny. i don't recall her saying that at all.
:-)
spies8claude 6:19 pm
You don't recall her saying what?
spies8chance 6:19 pm
I agree, No Exile is a waste, but if you don't believe the person is a spy, why vote for them? There are other alternatives.
camilla, what 'alternatives' were you speaking of here?
spies8broderick 6:20 pm
Claude, you of all people should not be using contradictions as a point against another
spies8camilla 6:20 pm
Exiling someone who is little to no help.
spies8chance 6:20 pm
This seems perfectly logical to me, if the person isn't going to help you at all, why keep them? It's not like we're in a constant state of lylo or anything. I think the 'especially early on' validates this point, and I agree. I don't think it's 'almost as good' but its better than N/L.
spies8claude 6:20 pm
I'm asking her to explain them.
spies8chance 6:20 pm
camilla, who were you referring to here?
spies8chance 6:20 pm
a person who isn't going to help you at all?
spies8gertrude has entered the room. 6:20 pm
spies8claude 6:20 pm
Why are you coaching her, Chance?
spies8chance 6:20 pm
'sup gertie.
spies8camilla 6:20 pm
Hey Gertie.
spies8broderick 6:20 pm
Hi Gertrude
spies8camilla 6:20 pm
He isn't coaching me.
spies8claude 6:20 pm
Yes, he is.
spies8gertrude 6:21 pm
He guys!
Hey*
spies8mary 6:21 pm
Hi.
spies8chance 6:21 pm
no, i'm not.
i'm simply showing how you're twisting her words, is all.
spies8camilla 6:21 pm
He's asking me questions. Which are in fact, very similar to yours
spies8gertrude 6:21 pm
Just catching up on the Burg reading for a second.
spies8claude 6:21 pm
I posted her words for everyone to see
I can't be 'twisting' them.
spies8camilla 6:21 pm
I also posted my words for everyone to see.
spies8chance 6:21 pm
and then twisted them out of context entirely with your interpretation of them.
spies8claude 6:21 pm
I asked her to explain them.
spies8camilla 6:21 pm
interpret them how you like.
spies8claude 6:21 pm
Which she still has yet to do.
How about this.
spies8claude 6:22 pm
After the way that she immediately(and improperly) accused me of 'deflecting' onto her(and even more ridiculously, onto Cory) after I started asking her questions, I will stake my life on Camilla being a Spy.
spies8isaac 6:22 pm
Ok claude you may want to tone this down slightly before we're back in a chat session like the other day when you were trying to convince us about Cory. Your words should be chosen with a bit more effort because I don't see coaching and Cam still has to answer so give it time
spies8camilla 6:22 pm
How would you like me to answer them? I have answered them, you just choose to ignore my answers and tell me I'm contradicting yourself. Isn't contradicting yourself your area of expretise?
spies8claude 6:23 pm
Hey chance, why don't you explain to Camilla what 'OMGUS' means.
spies8camilla 6:23 pm
OMGUS = Oh my god You suck.
Im not an idiot.
spies8claude 6:23 pm
Isn't contradicting yourself your area of expretise?
That statement is pure, 100% OMGUS.
boo my text color changed.
spies8camilla 6:24 pm
You are the one who has contradicted himself already.
spies8chance 6:24 pm
camilla's two statements both refer to the same thing - lurkers/unhelpfuls.
i'm not certain how you're not seeing that, claude.
spies8claude 6:24 pm
I DO see that.
spies8camilla 6:24 pm
[16:01] spies8claude: I did think that was suspicious
[16:01] spies8claude: ...
[16:01] spies8chance: but not a big enough deal to bring up publically?
[16:01] spies8chance: even though you suspect tina for doing the same thing?
[16:01] spies8claude: Yes.
spies8claude 6:24 pm
Except in one instance, she says 'you shouldn't lynch them'
spies8isaac 6:24 pm
Wow, you are actually a hypocrite you tell Chance not to answer for Camilla then jump in and ask Chance to explain something to her after you accuse him of coaching her? Wow, talk about a phishing expedition
spies8camilla 6:25 pm
yet you think I contradict myself more than you
congratulations. you are an idiopt.
spies8claude 6:25 pm
And then in the absolute next sentence, she says 'Yeahi t's okay to lynch that guy'
spies8camilla 6:25 pm
*idiot
spies8claude 6:25 pm
Isaac: It was a joke based on Chance having to explain OMGUS to someone earlier.
spies8lawrence has entered the room. 6:26 pm
spies8claude has entered the room. 6:26 pm
spies8chance has entered the room. 6:26 pm
spies8camilla has entered the room. 6:26 pm
spies8mary has entered the room. 6:26 pm
spies8isaac has entered the room. 6:26 pm
spies8gertrude has entered the room. 6:26 pm
spies8broderick has entered the room. 6:26 pm
spies8chance 6:26 pm
wow, did i get kicked?
huh.
thanks gertie.
You are about to be rate limited. Please wait a few seconds before sending, to avoid being rate limited 6:26 pm
spies8camilla 6:26 pm
Yet you tell me that my explanations are lackluster.
spies8claude 6:26 pm
?
spies8camilla 6:27 pm
brb
spies8claude 6:27 pm
You didn't even really explain it!
spies8gertrude 6:27 pm
No problem!
You are no longer rate limited, and you may now send messages. 6:27 pm
spies8broderick 6:27 pm
Two orange fonts, confusing
spies8mary 6:27 pm
Claude, yesterday you said Cory tried to shut you down by belittling you when you were asking him questions.
spies8claude 6:27 pm
First you said:
spies8mary 6:27 pm
Is that correct?
spies8claude 6:27 pm
Yes.
spies8mary 6:28 pm
Ok.
spies8claude 6:28 pm
Yeah, I hate being stuck in an organge font now.
spies8mary 6:28 pm
I'm trying to find that chat.
spies8claude 6:28 pm
But I don't want to close chat.
spies8broderick 6:28 pm
Just copy another font
spies8mary 6:28 pm
I don't think aggressive play is scummy.
But if it's used
spies8claude 6:28 pm
I don't think aggressive play is scummy.
spies8mary 6:28 pm
To stifle discussion that's another matter.
spies8claude 6:28 pm
That didn't work at all.
spies8claude 6:28 pm
sigh, brb
spies8chance 6:28 pm
claude -
spies8claude has left the room. 6:28 pm
spies8camilla 6:29 pm
Claude, if you're going to bus me, bus me. But I'll have the last laugh when I flip citizen.
spies8claude has entered the room. 6:29 pm
spies8chance 6:29 pm
And then in the absolute next sentence, she says 'Yeahi t's okay to lynch that guy'
spies8camilla 6:29 pm
Claude, if you're going to bus me, bus me. But I'll have the last laugh when I flip citizen.
spies8broderick 6:29 pm
You may want to repeat that Camilla
Now chance is orange. Attack of the oranges
spies8camilla 6:29 pm
I did, Brod. h
spies8chance 6:29 pm
i still don't see how that's a contradiction. in both, she's advocating lynching a lurker/unhelpful.
no, i'm still aqua.
spies8camilla 6:30 pm
I'm gonna change my font color. i kind of dont like this color atm
spies8broderick 6:30 pm
Chance ws orange with his statement right after Claude entered
spies8claude 6:30 pm
"I'll have the last laugh when I flip Citizen!"
spoken like a true spy.
spies8camilla 6:30 pm
red
spies8broderick 6:30 pm
Teacher
That is correcting our homework
spies8gertrude 6:30 pm
Yes?
spies8chance 6:30 pm
hahaha.
spies8claude has left the room. 6:30 pm
spies8gertrude 6:30 pm
I'm assuming that's me.
spies8camilla 6:31 pm
His case against me is awful
spies8claude has entered the room. 6:31 pm
spies8broderick 6:31 pm
I was talking about Camilla and her 'red'
spies8gertrude 6:31 pm
Lag test?
spies8camilla 6:31 pm
oh lol h
spies8gertrude 6:31 pm
Oh, woah. Major lag.
spies8claude 6:31 pm
I am more convinced that Camilla is a spy after 5 minutes of her talking than I am after days of talking to Cory.
spies8camilla 6:31 pm
That's nice.
spies8claude 6:32 pm
I meant what I said. I'll stake my life on you being a Spy.
spies8camilla 6:32 pm
I will literally be loling if I get exiled.
spies8claude 6:33 pm
I'm sure you would. loling over what you perceive as being exiled over 'how you word things'
spies8isaac 6:33 pm
Well do the rest of us a favor and make your vote official in the forum so the rest of us can see the damning evidence that con vinced you of this because I'm apparently still missing it somewhere.
spies8claude 6:33 pm
Not realizing that how you've reacted in here is much morei mportant than that.
spies8cinnamyn has entered the room. 6:33 pm
spies8camilla 6:33 pm
go ahead and stake your life. Your case against me is invalid. I maintained a point. Essentially what I said was:
"I am against a no lynch, there are other alternatives to it, such as lynching someone who is unhelpful, even if they happen to be a cit."
hey cinn h
spies8claude 6:33 pm
lol
spies8chance 6:33 pm
'sup sweetness.
spies8cinnamyn 6:33 pm
hey yall
spies8claude 6:34 pm
You are contradicting yourself right there.
spies8camilla 6:34 pm
how?
enlighten me
spies8claude 6:34 pm
You just advocated lynching someone who is unhelpful, 'even if they happen to be a citizen'
spies8broderick 6:34 pm
Hi Cinnamyn
spies8gertrude 6:35 pm
Hey Cinnamyn!
spies8claude 6:35 pm
Initially in response to me(as well as earlier in this conversation), you said: "If you don't believe someone is a Spy, why vote for them?"
So which is it
spies8cinnamyn 6:35 pm
aye bbz i made a post in da vote thread cuz rite now im at margot & chance, wuznt gonna stay long but now dat margot b on imma ask her sum queschinz
spies8camilla 6:36 pm
Lynching someone who is unhelpful, AKA someone inactive.
spies8claude 6:36 pm
"Even if they happen to be a cit"
spies8broderick 6:36 pm
Margot is on?
spies8claude 6:36 pm
That is the curcial statement.
crucial
spies8claude 6:37 pm
Ultimately, in my estimation, you tried to pander to the town by saying that you 'shouldn't vote someone that you don't think is a Spy'
And didn't realize that your next statement effectively(and now, with your clarification, absolutely) contradicted that.
spies8chance 6:38 pm
only it doesn't, you realize.
spies8claude 6:38 pm
...
Of course it does.
spies8camilla 6:38 pm
I'm not going to argue about my alignment. If you think I'm a spy, go on and vote for me. But I'm finished arguing with someone that twists my words around in order to make me appear scummy when he knows that his name was on the chopping block.
spies8chance 6:38 pm
no, it doesn't.
look.
the two statements you say are alike are -
spies8claude 6:39 pm
Here is what she says:
Essentially what I said was:
"I am against a no lynch, there are other alternatives to it, such as lynching someone who is unhelpful, even if they happen to be a cit."
spies8camilla 6:39 pm
you fail to see reality and im not going to argue with someone delusional that enjoys bussing against innocent people.
spies8chance 6:39 pm
'don't think is a spy' and 'even if they happen to be a cit'.
spies8claude 6:39 pm
how do I change my text color back?
spies8broderick 6:39 pm
Nothing thinking someone a spy is not the same as thinking them a citizen. No reads are possible
spies8claude 6:39 pm
Now she is A)being defeatist and B)personally attacking me.
Both of these are ALSO scumtells.
spies8chance 6:39 pm
you can vote someone for being unhelpful and they could 'happen to be a cit'. that doesn't mean you 'didn't think they were a spy'.
spies8broderick 6:40 pm
*not thinking..
spies8claude 6:40 pm
lol
Putting aside that that was a really bad effort at playing semantics on your part.
spies8broderick 6:40 pm
If you are using AIm you can change it on the bottom
spies8claude 6:41 pm
What she said initially was: "If a person isn't going to be helpful to you at all, why keep them?"
spies8chance 6:41 pm
am i talking to claude or cory here?
spies8camilla 6:41 pm
No. I'm not. I'm not going to argue with you. I am not defeated. I just am not willing to defend my case against someone who will not listen to my case without declaring me scum.
i am willing to listen to your case and "will not stake my life" that you are scum.
spies8gertrude 6:42 pm
Just for the record, the distinction between the two statements is clear, and is not "just semantics."
I thought they were kinda contradictory at first as well, but now I can clearly see the disparity.
Sorry if that's a tad late.
spies8claude 6:42 pm
Go read the forum post in question.
Putting that part aside for a moment, Camilla's responses/attitude toward me since this started are also scummy.
spies8camilla 6:44 pm
I am the same as I've always been. You would have no idea how I normally am because this is the first time you have spoken to me.
spies8claude 6:44 pm
First, she accuses me of deflecting. A)I didn't. And B)She was trying to deflect, at that moment, making her a hypocrite.
spies8broderick 6:44 pm
If you plan on voting for her, I suggest putting it on record int he vote thread
spies8claude 6:44 pm
Then, she OMGUSes me, maybe without realizing it. And she personally attacks me.
She has absolutely faltered under pressure.
spies8cory has entered the room. 6:45 pm
spies8camilla 6:45 pm
i called you an idiot because your case against me started with my wording.
of all things you accused me of being scum for my wording.
spies8cory 6:45 pm
The philosoraptor has returned.
spies8cinnamyn 6:45 pm
o joy
spies8cory 6:45 pm
Cinnamyn ate my dinner.
spies8claude 6:45 pm
You didn't call me an idiot until WELL after I stated that I thought your wording was scummy.
Nice try.
spies8cinnamyn 6:45 pm
i dont no y u keep trustin' me wit' yo food..
spies8camilla 6:45 pm
yeah i did. i said it in the exact same sentence
spies8chance 6:46 pm
claude, i just looked back up and read.
spies8claude 6:46 pm
Then that is not what I am referring to(I can't go look since I closed the window earlier).
spies8claude 6:46 pm
I am referring to recently.
Not that it really matters.
spies8chance 6:46 pm
camilla's comment that you were deflecting happened well before you really laid into her.
i don't think she was being a hypocrite.
spies8claude 6:46 pm
Initially, when I started to question her, she accused me of deflecting to Cory.
spies8chance 6:47 pm
no, she didn't.
spies8claude 6:47 pm
Yes, she absolutely 100% did.
spies8chance 6:47 pm
the first thing she accused you of was deflecting onto her.
spies8broderick 6:47 pm
Hi Cory
spies8chance 6:47 pm
i know she did, but not initially.
spies8gertrude 6:47 pm
Hey there, Cory!
spies8chance 6:47 pm
'sup cory.
spies8claude 6:47 pm
I'm pretty sure that she tried to accuse me of deflecting onto Cory first.
spies8chance 6:48 pm
spies8camilla 6:11 pm
You are making me seem shady in order to deflect suspicion on you. Stop changing tactics.
camilla's first mention of deflection.
no, she didn't.
spies8camilla 6:48 pm
[17:11] spies8camilla: You are making me seem shady in order to deflect suspicion on you. Stop changing tactics.
spies8claude 6:48 pm
Accusing me of deflection there is a deflection in and of itself ANYWAY.
spies8broderick 6:48 pm
spies8camilla (16:11:58): You are making me seem shady in order to deflect suspicion on you. Stop changing tactics.
spies8camilla 6:48 pm
this was the first thing i said after defending myself against his (then) polite questions
spies8claude 6:48 pm
So by her own definition, she is using 'shady tactics'
spies8broderick 6:48 pm
two minutes later... spies8camilla (16:13:35): Who you have been directly suspecting since day one. and with all due respect, you have been on the chopping block since i came in. you have been discussing everything, when cory was in, you were trying to deflect suspicion onto him, now its me.
spies8chance 6:48 pm
irrelevant at the moment.
spies8claude 6:48 pm
And she did it repeatedly later.
No, it's absolutely not irrelevant.
spies8cory 6:49 pm
Hi English, Brod, Chance
Not paying attention yet. Helping Mary find something
spies8chance 6:49 pm
yes, it is.
spies8camilla 6:49 pm
i was not trying to deflect suspicion off of me.
spies8claude 6:49 pm
lol
of course you weren't
spies8camilla 6:49 pm
i was expressing my opinion on what i thought you were doing
there is a difference
spies8chance 6:49 pm
the relevant point at the moment is that you accused camilla of saying that you deflected onto cory first.
she didn't.
spies8claude 6:50 pm
That point doesn't matter.
spies8camilla 6:50 pm
exactly
spies8chance 6:50 pm
and i submit that at the time camilla mentioned that you were deflecting onto her, there really wasn't that much for her to be deflecting.
spies8camilla 6:50 pm
of course it doesnt
spies8claude 6:50 pm
What matters is that she accused me of deflecting, while in reality she was deflecting herself.
spies8chance 6:50 pm
you can't just arbitrarily say a point doesn't matter, claude.
oh, and you weren't deflecting at all, amirite?
again - there really wasn't that much for her to be deflecting.
spies8claude 6:50 pm
How could I be, I started the conversation in the first place.
You're right, there wasn't
spies8chance 6:50 pm
exactly.
spies8claude 6:50 pm
But she still did it.
spies8chance 6:51 pm
who was on the chopping block before you started the conversation, claude?
spies8claude 6:51 pm
That is MORE if a point against her.
spies8chance 6:51 pm
in what universe?
you're making less and less sense.
spies8isaac 6:51 pm
Wow, I love how you think you can make certain points important and others moot depending on what helps your case the most
spies8chance 6:51 pm
i think it might be exponential to the number of capital letters you're using.
spies8camilla 6:51 pm
Honestly, he began this bus against me because I posted a few quotes by him in the burg that made him seem scummy. in all reality, this is a childish attempt to get back at me.
spies8claude 6:51 pm
lol
spies8chance 6:51 pm
i don't think so, camilla.
i think this is spy!claude trying desperately not to be lynched.
spies8claude 6:52 pm
Is that why I asked you to clarify your feelings on Cory first?
spies8chance 6:52 pm
could just be me, though.
spies8claude 6:52 pm
Like I said.
If Camilla flips citizen, you can lynch me.
spies8chance 6:52 pm
yeah, cause that's not a scumtell at all.
spies8camilla 6:52 pm
No. That was a seperate issue. After that you began to start in on me.
spies8gertrude 6:52 pm
Quick interjection: Where I come from, a "bussing" is one Spy trying to get another Spy lynched. Is that correct here, as well?
spies8chance 6:52 pm
that's correct where i come from as well.
spies8claude 6:52 pm
Yes, that is actually what bussing means.
spies8gertrude 6:52 pm
Then why does Camilla keep saying she's being bussed?
spies8claude 6:52 pm
Camilla just keeps using the term out of context.
spies8gertrude 6:52 pm
Oh, ok.
spies8chance 6:52 pm
i'm going to go post the chat so far.